|
In this
article we describe the treatment of a patient
affected with serious epilepsy. We
based the music therapy work on strengthening the
mother-child interaction, inspired by the
psychodynamic theoretical model. It is centred on
the "Iso" principle and on the "intermediary object".
The change occurred through: affective "tunings" (Stern);
empathic mirroring; sonorous dialogue; sensory
stimulation; vocal and instrumental improvisation.
We used the
"sound- rhythm- movement" paradigm for
going back to the archaic and primitive forms
of pre and post-birth communication.
We
stimulated and increased the interaction between the
patient and his mother within the music
therapy relationship.
Case history
Leonardo is a child who, in his short life (he was born
on 2/8/1995), already has a serious, "severe" clinical
history behind him which is extremely difficult
for his family to accept and to endure, especially
considering his body weakened by so much
suffering.
Second of two children,
he was born by Caesarean
after 37 weeks of pregnancy. His mother
tells me that during the first three months
of the pregnancy she suffered a detachment of
the placenta, but in the amniocentesis and
checkups everything appeared to be within the
norm. At the moment of birth, due to clumsy handling
by the nurses, he fractured his right collarbone and
already in the first hours of life problems of
adjustment and adaptation and a slight deformity
of both hands, or rather a muscular retraction
of the ring fingers, were observed. The child
slept for a lot of the time, didn’t suck, didn’t cry,
wasn’t reactive and manifested respiratory seizures.
In this dramatic start
to his life his relationship with
his mother was also seriously damaged. M. (Leonardo’s
mother) tells me
how, not without an enormous
sense of guilt and
a huge weight of emotional
experiences, in the
first few days after the
birth she couldn’t take
him into her arms, nurse him, look at him or caress
him, so great was her refusal of his physical appearance
and of all the problems that the child
showed.
At 4 months he became
ill with chickenpox and at
the end of the illness there was a rise in temperature accompanied by a
convulsive fit.
Following this episode he was taken into the care of
a neuropsychiatrist who put him on an preventative anticonvulsant
treatment.
Around the 5th month
the boy had another convulsive fit
which was this time diagnosed as epilepsy.
From this moment on his life and that of his family
(above all his mother) was completely devastated
and went into a never interrupted whirlwind
of stays in hospital, trips to specialized centres
and attempts at treatment with extremely strong
medicines which caused innumerable side
effects.
At 5 months he is thus admitted to hospital in Pavia
and goes into a pre-coma state, with a "condition"
that causes 40 fits a day. During this period
his mother is always present, his only familiar,
reassuring figure. She comforts him, cradles
him, talks to him, caresses him, hugs him, sings
him a wordless lullaby whose melody is copied
from a sponge toy that she puts on his pillow to
send him to sleep. After the initial refusal their
bond becomes more and more secure, intense and
full of kindness and affection (M. has put her
own life to one side to be close to her son).
The diagnosis is very
severe: Leonardo suffers from
a rare and very serious pathology: Partial epilepsy
with migrating seizures.
He is hospitalised in
Paris, at the Saint-Vincent du Pol
hospital where he begins
an experimentalt reatment based on a drug
(stiripentol, which he
still takes today) that causes
oesophageal ulcers,
chronic constipation, feeding
problems with consequent loss of body
weight, and muscular hypotonicity.
The illness is characterised by continual multi-focal random
seizures (that involve both hemispheres of
the brain); resistance to conventional anti-epileptic
drugs; lack of demonstrable aetiology; considerable
psychomotor delay. The seizures are
frequent, they take place in sequence and often
they start covertly even when, after previous releases,
the patient is improving. Neurological
deterioration, due to the block of myelinisation,
causes a gradual loss of eye contact (cerebral
hypovision), the incapacity to grasp objects
and loss of motor and socialization abilities. Between
several consecutive seizures patients are floppy, they tend to lose saliva
and they often
show drowsiness. They can’t eat or drink
and when another block of seizures takes over
they get worse.
At present the boy shows all of the symptomatology, but
the continuity of the treatment has reduced
the frequency of the seizures. Also his feeding
has slightly increased (although the condition of
malnutrition remains) and, thanks to the administration
of semi-solid food he is learning the
chewing mechanism.
Music therapy observation I
had the chance to observe the child for a long time
in his family context at various times of the day
and throughout the course of the treatment, which
started in October 1999 and concluded in November
2001. Using the music therapy evaluation protocols
suggested by Boxill (1991), I performed an
overall evaluation of his relational and communicational
behaviour and of his reactions to
the various sonorous, tactile, visual, sensory and
motor stimuli.
Leonardo is a gentle and quiet child, but his silence is
extremely "noisy", thick with emotional and affective
experiences. His body is fragile, delicate, and
thin to the very limits of survival. He has a thoracic
kyphosis with cervical compensation and protracted
shoulders. He spends most of the day laid
out in his bed in a supine position, or sitting in
an armchair or on a settee.
At a motor level there is a generalized hypotonicity, but
he can hold a sitting position with support and
with a moderate control of his torso. His head,
however, falls forwards or backwards if not held.
Placed in a prone
position, he frees his arms with help
and makes as if to lift his head. Motor stereotypies are
present, particularly in the head and both
arms, which move continuously from left to right
and viceversa. His lower limbs, however, are slightly
more tonic and Leonardo makes small movements
in an attempt to lift them, or stretches them
out, tensing the muscles.
His manipulation and exploration of objects is much
reduced due to his difficulty in grasping, intensified
by the muscular retraction of the ring fingers,
however, if suitable stimulated he makes as
if to explore them and to initiate a type of game,
managing to integrate the visual channel with
the tactile one. From this point of view the child
receives continual stimulation from the innumerable
games, psychomotility objects and other
objects created for him by his mother that are
scattered around the house. The child shows that
he is able to stare (for example, he looks at some
objects that hang from the walls of the room),
to follow an object even if it is not particularly coloured
for a short way, up to a distance of
about a metre. Beyond this distance he gradually loses
visual interest.
He is attracted above all by noises and sounds around him, despite not
always being able to differentiate them.
When he hears these sounds, he looks
towards their source, excluding the visual channel.
In the first observation sessions I stimulated the
child with various instruments and each time
he turned his gaze and stopped to listen for a
few minutes. He was particularly attracted: by the
tambourine, moving his hands closer to it and lightly
scratching its surface; by the maracas with which
I caressed his whole body while he responded with
a slight smile; by the triangle (the one with
the higher frequency) whose sound completely grabbed
his attention.
But the instrument that could draw him in completely at
a physical (vibro-tactile) and mental (sensations,
perceptions, emotions) level was without
doubt the piano. The sound of this instrument
seemed to be appreciated by the child.
When he lay on top of it and listened to my sound-musical
playing he responded continuously, showing
curiosity and pleasure with tonic
and mimicking variations Every
so often the child utters sounds (a sort of muttering)
or some vocalizations (rarely) and manages
to say two words (water and mummy).
Before the seizures he also managed to emit warbles He doesn’t cry (he has never cried) and he doesn’t
laugh, rather he emits wailing sounds and
smiles.
His communication takes place on a completely non-verbal level, through smiling and some tonic
variation, but his face and his gestures are
extremely expressive.
The first time I met him I was struck by his eyes, which, at that moment, expressed sadness and
"told" his story, but at other times communicate wonde r, serenit y, anger or irritation. Sometimes he
closes them, withdrawing into himself into a sleep that appears to be a defensive condition, expressing
a lack of trust or a desire not to
communicate and to isolate himself. On other occasions he knits his eyebrows or opens them wide, especially
when he is in his
mother’s arms and is listening to her
voice. His preferred communication object is his
mother, who for him re p resents life. I observed how
rich their relationship is in "affect attunement", small
communication signals which make them
both happy in a continuous interplay of non-verbal
adjustments and attuning.
Leonardo loves
physical contact, kisses, caresses and
his mother’s spoken or singsong voice. When his
mother turns towards him, or moves around the
room, the child brightens up and reactivates his
sensorial channels. When she picks him up and cuddles
him he livens up and appears visibly happy,
more dynamic and more receptive. If his mother
moves away he expresses, through facial mimicking,
his disappointment and his loneliness and
more often than not he takes refuge in motor
stereotypy or immobility.
In rare moments of restlessness his mother’s verbal participation
and their tonic dialogue immediately reassure
and calm him.
Leonardo accepts his mother’s touch in all parts of
his body, responding with moderate relaxation and,
sometimes, he makes to caress his mother’s face and hands. In my arms,
or those of another stranger,
he is tenser, he stiffens, but if his mother is
nearby and speaks to him, reassuring him, he gains
trust, relaxes and accepts the contact, the relationship.
Sometimes his mother asks him questions (for example,
"are you hungry?", "where does it hurt?")
and the boy answers with gestures, touching a
part of his body (his mouth if he is hungry,
his nose if he has trouble breathing).
His mother is the person who feeds him (he only accepts
food from her), who looks after him, who makes
him feel safe and who encourages him to explore
his surroundings, whereas the other family
members (father, brother and babysitter) are
equally as important but more marginal and less
"attuned" to his state of mind and his communication system.
Intervention method
The treatment took place over the course of two years,
with brief periods of interruption, and had a
frequency of two 40 minute sessions a week.
The setting consisted of a not very wide semi-soundproof room
with soft lighting. The materials I
used were some musical instruments (piano, tambourine,
maracas, castanets, sleigh bells, triangle,
drum, cymbal) and some small coloured objects
in fabric or plastic belonging to the child (including
a bracelet made of concentric circles, a blue
satin scarf and gloves with a sound game at one
end).
I used the rhythmic-sound-musical element with a
double functionality: both as an "activator", making
use of the wide range of timbre qualities, variations
of intensity, low-middle-high pitch range,
constant rhythmic pulsations modulated in
agogic; and as a "container", aiming especially at
physical relaxation and at the retrieval of primitive, archaic,
reassuring, feeding sounds, creating an
atmosphere like a "sound bath" In
the light of the observations made in the first phase,
I considered the mother’s constant presence to
be essential and necessary. She participated actively
in the sessions and was the linchpin of a project
aimed at strengthening mother-child communication
through the integration and attuning
of their emotional states with mine, in a constant
search for a sound identity. The start of the
session was typified by a welcoming and greeting
period in which I created an environment favourable
to relating by means of a sung and
played welcome motif. As Edith Boxill (1991) states,
the "contact song" provides a secure base for
the person, it is a statement of trust, of being, of
becoming, of going beyond".
The melody, played in the middle part of the piano,
was very simple and mainly based on third intervals
in binary time (both characteristic of most
children’s songs), in a descending progression in
the key of C major.
In the bass I
harmonised with simple major chords
played as arpeggios.
This motif remained unchanged throughout the sessions
and it formed a signal of recognition of the
activity that the child was about to perform.
His mother’s voice, singing along with me, formed a
further positive reinforcement.
Often the child was agitated at the beginning of the
session, showing motor stereotypy and tensing his
lower limbs, but the contact with his mother
who held him in her arms and the sound of
the piano, in particular of the welcome song "Ciao
Leonardo", made him relax completely, so much
so that he stopped to listen with great attention,
often turning his head towards me, stretching
out his legs and releasing the muscular tension.
The child was then
laid on the lid of the piano, mainly
to receive the vibro-tactile stimulations produced
by the instrument. This technique allows
us to involve patients at a physical as well as
auditory level, especially in pathologies with multiple
sensory disabilities or severe motor damage.
The music therapy
approach in Leonardo’s case was
based on physical resonance which makes use
of the sound waves coming from the body of the
piano.
This vibratory effect enabled strong emotions to be
evoked in the child, accompanied by strong internal
sensations which are also good for stimulating physical
exploration. In
musical improvisation or in the reproduction of songs,
music, sounds characteristic of the Iso of the
child’s or of the mother-child pair I took my cue
from every movement Leonardo made, his facial
expression and the non-verbal (postural, physical,
rhythmic, vocal, gesture) and verbal dialogue of
the relationship between M. and Leonardo,
with the intention of mirroring them with
sounds and rhythms, establishing similarity and
synchrony between feelings, states of mind, body movements, behaviours and
the sound/
musical production.
During the
improvisation I put myself into a condition of
maximum empathetic listening (internal and
external), respecting the pauses, the response times,
the silence, my perception of emotional states
and sensations; and thus I also encouraged and
stimulated the communication, confirmed, changed
and redirected the behaviour, integrating Leonardo’s
and his mother’s responses with my
musicality.
In a circular game of sound-music (proposal-response), gesture
and physical dialogue, Leonardo’s
mother stimulated him in various activities
which involved his arms and legs, or other
parts of his body, mirroring the result of my improvisation
and vice versa, I improvised in response
to their interaction.
I gradually moved from the lower to the higher register
of the instrument, recreating M.’s tactile stimulation
which started from Leonardo’s feet and
moved up to his head, and vice versa, a quick stroking
movement from his head to his feet using
a coloured veil in a descending motion that I
recreated with glissandos.
His mother also stimulated him with extension and
stretching movements of his arms until he touched
an instrument positioned a certain distance from
his head, on a very soft melody with a
calm, relaxed modulation produced by playing the
black keys with both hands in an ascending motion,
reaching a climax with a chord sustained for
a long time (with the same sounds) at the moment
of the greatest extension. In the relaxation stage,
his mother produced a slight tremolo in
his arms that I recreated with right hand trills over
a descending pentatonic melody in the left hand.
The boy responded to these stimuli by relaxing all
of his muscles, relaxing his facial expression and
smiling.
Thus, I used a wide
range of pianistic techniques (trills,
staccato, small runs, acciaccatura, appoggiatura, legato, scales,
chromatic and not, arpeggios), of
variations of intensity (heavy, light, soft, energetic
touch), of rhythmic pace (slow, fast, andante,
allegro), of harmonic and chordal possibilities, of
tonal, atonal, modal and pentatonic elements,
or unstructured, always attuned to what
was happening in the relationship at that moment.
At times M. "rocked" Leonardo’s body by twisting
his bust and legs from right to left, or from
below upwards and my improvisation mirrored all
these movements with childlike, rocking melodies,
although rhythmically clearly pronounced, with
strong intensity, or staccato, "pulsating" note
or chords which made the boy "pulsate" (as if
on a rocking horse).
The stimulation and
relaxation activities were alternated
and there were numerous pauses and silences.
Other than by the gestural expressiveness and by his
mother’s touch, the child was also provoked (both
on the piano and on the carpet) by other instruments
whose use was connected to physical sensations,
tactile and auditory stimulation, manipulation
and exploration. Starting from Leonardo’s
small gestures (such as for example light
rubbing of the tambourine, small movements of
his feet on the castanets, slight shaking of
the maracas or a smile), we proceeded with the recreation
of these through song, improvisation, vocalizations
and by encouraging their repetition and
elaboration, especially through verbal support from
his mother and me. For example, Leonardo’s
mother beat his feet on the castanets, one
at a time or simultaneously, following the rhythm
of my improvisation; thus, on a simple binary
rhythmic unit (2/4 or 2/8), I created a melody
and introduced gradual variations, increasing
or decreasing the tempo; the binary rhythm
also typified of several songs connected to
the sound of certain instruments, whose melody
recalled the welcome song. I also introduced postural
changes, laying the boy in a prone position or sitting in front of me,
supported from behind,
to facilitate his movements and change his
perception of the environment. These changes didn’t
always seem to be appreciated, however, causing
Leonardo to express his irritation with wails
and by intensifying the loss of saliva.
I often finished by playing a piece of classical
music (Debussy’s First Arabesque), an expression
of my sound identity, which was particularly
appreciated both by the mother and the child
and allowed for a release of the emotional
tension.
The piece, characterised by formal vagueness,
blurred and indistinct melodies and a
calm, rocking
rhythm, completely relaxed them both and
held them in a symbolic embrace, like the
gazes,
caresses and embraces of the mother-child
interaction.
Evaluation of the intervention
On the whole Leonardo responded well to the
music therapy treatment which enriched his
perceptive,
expressive and communicative
potential.
The most significant changes were seen at a
motor level with a clear reduction in stereotypy
especially while listening to music with a
calm,
rocking rhythm, and with a slight increase in
spontaneous motor activity thanks to the vibro-tactile
stimulation and the innumerable stimuli
for manipulation, exploration of the
instruments.
After a year the child managed to interact with
my stimulations, playing with both hands on a
small keyboard, facilitated by his position (he was
lying face down on his stomach on my legs or on
his mother’s). He also played some small
instruments
(sleigh bells, maracas,
castanets) without
help, managing to hold the weight for short
periods and to produce sounds of low
intensity.
On a few occasions after the end of the session
he uttered vocalisations different to those
normally
emitted. Sometimes he showed reactions of
refusal or isolation depending on his physical
condition (the frequency of the seizures or other
health problems) and on his emotional condition
but also with a communicative intent within the
relationship with his mother and the music
therapy
relationship.
With some particularly pleasurable stimulations
like the sound of the piano he showed very clear
expressive reactions with prolonged smiles, eye
movements or sighs, and his listening and
concentration
ability increased.
I was also able to observe an improvement and an enrichment of the relational exchanges between mother and child in a context
(non-verbal) characterised by a calm, pleasant, joyful atmosphere which created in both a condition favourable to interaction. His mother benefited because the time dedicated to the session represented a moment of joy, relaxation and privileged
relationship with her child in the course of a day full of demanding commitments. In the end, the
entire treatment formed a great help in terms of a mental space in which to overcome negative
feelings of anxiety and resignation. More than once his mother found herself at the beginning of the session to be in a state of great physical stress and low spirits or despondency which had
repercussions on the child, but at the end of the
session both seemed revived, relaxed and revitalized in their communicative
exchanges.
Conclusions
Beyond the distinctions between music in therapy and music as therapy, and therefore between interventions focussed on the music’s own
therapeutic qualities (MUSIC therapy) and those based on the development of the relationship (music THERAPY), the importance that both elements (the sound mediator and the relationship) have in the context of music therapy is
indisputable.
This paper aims above all to offer an opportunity for reflection on the richness and complexity of the mother-child relationship and on the very
special communication that is set up between them, even before birth, which is so important throughout the course of the life of every human being.
I believe it is essential for whoever works in a therapeutic area and specifically in the area of music
therapy, that is in the fragile field of "relationship specialists", to know the intersubjective world inside out, to inquire and question
themselves incessantly on the principles and
procedures that govern this basic relationship. More so for music therapists that use the element of sound as a therapeutic mediator, which turns out to be one of the preferred channels of
communication of the first relationship and one of the few communication channels of which a trace or a memory remains even in situations of severe physical or mental
disability.
Learning about and studying the research and theories on the mother-child relationship in depth helps the music therapist: first to get to know themselves better, to become aware of what characterizes them as human beings and their way of relating to others; to have a point of reference and a model upon which to build the therapeutic relationship; to get to know the client better and to reach very profound levels of emotional and affective attunement together with
them; finally, in the case of working with children with serious pathologies, to use their relationship with their mothers with the aim of strengthening the element of sound’s therapeutic mediation and enriching the relationship
itself, or identifying and if necessary reducing or
eliminating, also preventatively, its
disfunctionality.
|
|
Leonardo
is a child who,
in his short life
(he was born
on 2/8/1995),
already has a
serious, "severe" clinical
history behind
him which is
extremely difficult
to accept and
to endure
Leonardo
suffers from
a rare and very serious
pathology:
Partial epilepsy with migrating
seizures.
|
|
References
Benenzon R.
Manuale di
musicoterapia (Music
Therapy Manual),
Borla, Rome, 1992.
Benenzon R.
Teoria
della musicoterapia (Music
Therapy Theory),
Cooperativa
Novastampa, Verona,
1994.
Benenzon R.
La
nuova musicoterapia (The new
music therapy), Phoenix,
Rome,
1997.
Boxill E.H.
La musicoterapia per bambini disabili (Music therapy for
disabled children),
Omega, Turin, 1991.
Bowlby J.
Una base sicura (A secure base),
Cortina Milan, 1989.
Postacchini P.L.,
Ricciotti A., Borghesi M.
Musicoterapia (Music Therapy),
Carocci, Rome, 1997.
Schaffer R.
(edited by), L’interazione madre-
bambino. Oltre la teoria dell’attaccamento
(Mother- child interaction. Beyond attachment theory),
Franco Angeli, Milan, 1984.
Stern D.
Il mondo interpersonale del bambino (Interpersonal world
of the infant), Boringhieri, Turin, 1987.
Stern D.
Diario di un bambino (Diary of a baby),
Mondadori, Milan, 1991.
Stern D.
La nascita del sé (The birth of the self), in Ammaniti
M.(edited by), La
nascita del sé (The birth of the self)
, Laterza, Rome-Bari, 1991.
Trevarthen C.
Le emozioni intuitive:
l’evoluzione del loro ruolo nella
comunicazione tra madre e bambino (Intuitive
emotions: the evolution of their role
in communication between mother and child),
in Ammaniti M., Dazzi N., (edited by),
Affetti,
natura e sviluppo delle relazioni
interpersonali (Affection, nature and development
of interpersonal relationships),
Laterza, Rome-Bari, 1990.
Winnicott D. W.
Gioco e realtà (Playing and reality),
Armando, Rome, 1983.
|